Residents near Tetbury Industrial Estate have reported ongoing health issues, including persistent coughing and nausea, a week after a series of fires described as “toxic” erupted at the site. The fires began on Monday, January 12, and caused thick, black smoke and a noxious odor that forced families to keep children and pets indoors.
Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue received over 50 calls regarding the blaze, while Cotswold District Council confirmed that no authorization was granted for the fires, despite claims from the industrial estate’s owner that permission had been given.
The estate lies approximately two miles from Highgrove House, owned by King Charles III. The council is now preparing a case file for potential legal action against the estate owners.
READ MORE: Gardening Experts Reveal the Most Effective Way to Kill Weeds for Good
READ MORE: I Tried M&S’s New Healthier Food Range — Only Two Items Were Worth Buying Again
Residents have voiced their distress and ongoing symptoms since the fires' conclusion around January 19. One local described a widespread cough affecting several households without typical signs of a cold or illness, suggesting the smoke exposure as a possible cause.
Kayleigh, a nearby resident, described the fires as producing a “toxic” smell that penetrated her home, accompanied by thick smoke so dense she could barely see out the windows. Similarly, Lynsey Hart recounted feeling physically ill due to the fumes, even vomiting during a walk near the estate.
Cotswold District Council emphasized its lack of approval for burning waste materials at the site, explaining that such permits are issued by the Environment Agency, and burning trade waste is prohibited. The council has worked closely with police, the fire service, and the Environment Agency, visiting the site several times, engaging with the owner, and gathering evidence.
Enforcement actions include issuing a fixed penalty notice and a nuisance abatement notice to halt the smoke-producing activities. The council reiterated its commitment to protect residents’ wellbeing and indicated it would not hesitate to pursue further legal measures if necessary.
In contrast, the industrial estate owner asserted that the fires were approved by the fire brigade and council as part of a clean-up effort, citing misuse of the area for illegal dumping. The owner claimed the fires are now extinguished and the site cleared.
Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue clarified that while they don’t grant permission for controlled burns, the occupier had notified them in advance. This communication helps the fire service distinguish between planned and emergency fires, ensuring efficient resource allocation.
The community continues to cope with the aftermath of these events, as concerns over environmental safety and health persist.