The Green Party leadership of Forest of Dean District Council has narrowly survived a no-confidence vote tied to the handling of a major housing development plan calling for 13,200 new homes.
On February 19, the council debated a motion proposed by Independent Councillor John Francis of Longhope and Huntley, aimed at removing Council Leader Adrian Birch and his cabinet over concerns about the management of the district’s local plan.
Councillor Francis criticized the council’s approach as “undemocratic,” highlighting what he described as poor engagement and sidelining of members and residents throughout the development process. He apologized for bringing the motion but emphasized the need for better representation and in-depth discussion on housing strategy, warning that alternative site options were not adequately explored.
READ MORE: Josh Osude Sent Off as Forest Green Rovers Draw 1-1 with Boreham Wood
READ MORE: Wild Boar Piglets Leap Across River in Gloucestershire Haven – In Pictures
The plan includes proposals for a 3,500-home new town at Glynchbrook near Redmarley by the M50 junction, as well as 2,000 homes near Churcham along the A40. These developments have drawn significant public attention, with residents attending the meeting and demonstrating outside.
In response, Council Leader Adrian Birch defended the process, stating the council had followed government-imposed timelines and consulted extensively. He noted that the underlying policies remain consistent with previous plans and that additional member meetings are scheduled post-consultation to address concerns in detail.
Birch also pointed out practical limitations, noting that land can only be allocated where owners agree, and compulsory purchase is not a viable option. He argued that failing to approve a local plan risks uncontrolled speculative development, which would be worse for the district.
Voices from other parties reflected the mixed sentiments. Liberal Democrat Gill Moseley criticized the leadership’s listening efforts, advocating for more inclusive discussions. Labour’s Patrick Kyne dismissed the motion as subjective and unproductive amid broader council challenges.
Several councillors warned against obstructing the plan. Green Councillor Sid Phelps stressed the difficulty of meeting increased housing targets, while Progressive Independent Jamie Elsmore raised democratic concerns over member engagement. Councillor Richard Burton urged voting down the motion, warning that without a local plan, developers would dictate terms unchecked.
Ultimately, the council rejected the no-confidence motion by a tight margin of 19 to 18, with one abstention, allowing the Green leadership to continue navigating the contentious development plan.