Cheltenham Borough Council has approved a contentious application to build a contemporary two-storey, four-bedroom detached house within the garden of The Garden House on West Drive. Despite concerns from local residents and councilors over preserving the historic character of this prominent Pittville conservation area, planners emphasized that Cheltenham should not be frozen in a Regency-era aesthetic.
The proposal, submitted by Alistair Brydon on behalf of his wife’s family, sparked 26 objections citing road safety, privacy loss, impact on trees and open garden land, and the potential negative effect on the conservation area’s heritage. Residents worry that allowing such development could set a precedent, threatening other green spaces and architectural integrity in the town.
Objectors highlighted the importance of Wellington Square, one of England’s finest Regency squares, and urged for a design more in keeping with the local heritage. “This is a unique, historically significant area safeguarded for nearly two centuries,” a spokesperson for the residents said, appealing for the rejection of the plan or a more sympathetic resubmission.
READ MORE: “Massive” Changes to Cheltenham Bus Network Raise Concerns Over Passenger Consultation
READ MORE: ‘Disgraceful’ Gloucester Cycle Path Work Replaces Historic Paving Stones with Plain Tarmac
In contrast, Mr. Brydon outlined the family’s long-standing connection to the property and community, noting that previous proposals for denser developments had been blocked. The new design aims to balance adding to Cheltenham’s housing stock while respecting the garden’s importance and supporting future care needs for Christine Ormerod, who recently moved into care due to dementia.
“Christine’s move into care, with its associated costs, has motivated this plan to maximize the property’s value responsibly,” Brydon explained. The family hopes to preserve The Garden House’s legacy and prevent overdevelopment in Pittville.
Councillors voiced mixed opinions during debate. Juan Carlos Garcia Clamp opposed the design’s modern style, arguing it disrupts the Regency architectural harmony and risks a damaging precedent. Conversely, Coun. Jan Foster supported the modern approach, suggesting that a pastiche design could be more visually disruptive and emphasized that Cheltenham is a living town evolving with the times.
Other councillors raised concerns about the house’s scale, design, and placement, with suggestions for greater setbacks and integrated garages to minimize visual impact. Despite the divided views, the planning committee voted five in favor, two against, and two abstentions, granting approval for the development.
This decision highlights the ongoing debate between conservation and contemporary development in historic towns and reflects Cheltenham’s willingness to embrace thoughtful modern architecture alongside its cherished heritage.