A proposal to designate wildflower meadows near Highgrove House as protected land for community outdoor recreation has been refused by Cotswold District Council, much to the disappointment of local residents who believe it would also maintain the peaceful character of King Charles III’s Cotswold residence.
The Longfurlong Greenfields Association, a residents' group, had submitted an application aiming to safeguard private fields situated between Longfurlong Lane and Bath Road on the outskirts of Tetbury. The group emphasised the importance of this area as a priority conservation habitat within the Cotswold National Landscape and noted its significance as a heritage setting on the southern approach to the historic town.
Controversy surrounds the site as separate development plans may see up to 135 homes constructed there, bringing housing within yards of the King’s country residence. Local residents have voiced concerns that such development could pose serious security risks to the Royal Household and intrude on the tranquillity that currently surrounds Highgrove.
READ MORE: GCSE Results Day 2026: Gloucestershire Students Receive Their Grades
READ MORE: Concerns Raised Over Dangerous Tree in Cheltenham as Large Branch Falls
Speaking at the planning committee meeting on 11 August, Steve Keitley represented over 150 residents supporting the conservation proposal. He emphasised the aim was “to protect and preserve” the area within the National Landscape, highlighting its value as a scenic outlook for those travelling along Longfurlong Lane, Bath Road, and nearby public footpaths, including the Monarch’s Way.
Keitley also noted that the group wished to maintain the “village-like environment” that has remained undisturbed for many decades, potentially centuries. Peter Martin, chairman of the Longfurlong Greenfields Association, reinforced that their plans would not cause increased water drainage or flooding, nor would visitor numbers, traffic, or parking change, as the site’s use would remain consistent.
Martin detailed that there would be no alterations to boundaries or new construction; the land has not been farmed extensively in recent years except for hay cutting, which is set to continue. He appealed to councillors to apply what he called “common sense” in their decision-making.
Concerns were raised about insufficient information regarding the agricultural quality of the land and the possible impact of the proposals on local biodiversity.
During discussions, Councillor Nikki Ind expressed personal difficulty with the decision, acknowledging the community’s attachment to the land but feeling constrained by legal considerations. Councillor Patrick Coleman voiced support for the application, describing it as a commendable effort by local residents, though he doubted his view would prevail.
Councillor David Fowles praised the concept but suggested deferring the decision pending more information, while Councillor Paul Evans warned of setting a precedent that could lead to similar change-of-use applications, ultimately proposing refusal in line with the officer’s recommendation. The motion to refuse was passed by five votes to two, with one abstention.
This outcome leaves the fate of the wildflower meadows uncertain, with the possibility of housing development still looming near the King’s cherished Cotswolds retreat.